I posted a test message to one of my lists a short time ago. It was
returned, as I knew it would be since this problem has been ongoing
for a while now, with the error message attached. The list has the "topics"
feature implemented, so the test did not go to everyone, in case someone
wonders. The post was in fact distributed to the list. I can
document that. I sent the original posting to the PSUVM peer.
Can anyone shed any light on this? I have not knowingly made any changes
to my lists that I would expect to cause this problem, yet it is
occurring fairly regularly on several of my lists, some using the "topics"
feature and some not. All lists that I own are peered between PCCVM and PSUVM.
Thanks in advance,
W. K. (Bill) Gorman
List Owner: CANINE-L EQUINE-L FELINE-L
------------------------------- ATTACHMENT ----------------------------
>Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it seems to have been
>already sent to the CANINE-L list. That is, a message with identical body (but
>possibly different headers) has been posted to the list recently, either by you
>or by someone else. If you have a good reason to resend this message to the
>list (for instance because half of the outbound spool files were lost in a disk
>crash at some intermediate node), please alter the message text in some way
>before resending it. Note that altering the "Subject:" line or adding blank
>lines at the top or bottom of the message is not sufficient; you should instead
>add a line at the top explaining why you are re-sending the message, for the
>benefit of the list membership.
>
>------------------------- Rejected message (41 lines) -------------------------
>Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from PCCVM.ICC.PCC.EDU (NJE origin MAILER@PCCVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU
>(LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3737; Fri, 8 Jul 1994 11:15:48 -0400
>Received: from PCCVM.BITNET (NJE origin LISTSERV@PCCVM) by PCCVM.ICC.PCC.EDU
>(LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3224; Fri, 8 Jul 1994 08:17:27 -0700
>Received: from PCCVM.BITNET by PCCVM.BITNET (LISTSERV release 1.8a) with NJE id
> 1130 for [log in to unmask]; Fri, 8 Jul 1994 08:17:22 -0700
>Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (NJE origin MAILER@PSUVM) by PCCVM.ICC.PCC.EDU
> (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3213; Fri, 8 Jul 1994 08:17:08 -0700
>Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@PSUVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU
> (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3595; Fri, 8 Jul 1994 11:14:48 -0400
>Received: from PSUVM.BITNET by PSUVM.PSU.EDU (LISTSERV release 1.8a) with NJE
> id 7284 for [log in to unmask]; Fri, 8 Jul 1994 11:14:47 -0400
>Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (NJE origin MAILER@CMUVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU
> (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3593; Fri, 8 Jul 1994 11:14:47 -0400
>Received: from CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (NJE origin 34AEJ7D@CMUVM) by
> CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4774; Fri,
> 8 Jul 1994 11:15:12 -0400
>Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
>Newsgroups: bit.listserv.canine-l
>Date: Fri, 8 Jul 1994 11:14:47 EDT
>Reply-To: Discussion forum for Dog fanciers <[log in to unmask]>
>Sender: Discussion forum for Dog fanciers <[log in to unmask]>
>Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was [log in to unmask]
>From: "W. K. (Bill) Gorman" <[log in to unmask]>
>Organization: Radio Free Michigan
>Subject: TEST: chasing the duplicate posting bug
>X-LSVRepTo:
>X-LSVopts: NOACK Org=CANINE-L@PCCVM
>X-LSVvia: CANINE-L@PSUVM CANINE-L@PCCVM
>X-LSVTo: [log in to unmask] CANINE-L Discussion List
>X-LSVTag: Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>X-LSVTag: Date: Fri, 08 Jul 94 11:14:47 EDT
>X-LSVTag: From: "W. K. (Bill) Gorman" <[log in to unmask]>
>X-LSVTag: Organization: Radio Free Michigan
>X-LSVTag: Subject: TEST: chasing the duplicate posting bug
>X-LSVTag: To: CANINE-L Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
>X-LSVTag: Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
>To: $PEER$ <[log in to unmask]>
>
>Ignore this.
|
