Wed, 30 Mar 1994 02:05:43 +0200
|
On Tue, 29 Mar 1994 17:08:56 -0500 Roger Burns <[log in to unmask]> said:
>Yes, but then (1) recipients may get aggravated at seeing that long To:
>header each time you send out that message (and it could be hundreds or
>thousands of lines long),
Pete was suggesting the use of a DISTRIBUTE job, which won't show a huge
"To:" field but put only one address in it. You can even hide the name of
the recipient completely if you specify "BSMTP" instead of their real
name in the //TO DD * list.
The file suggestion will work for non-BITNET recipients, but may create
problems for users who do have the ability to receive files. Non-BITNET
users can deliver files via BITNET through a DISTRIBUTE job. For
instance, if a BITNET user requests a file via GET from LISTSERV-TCP/IP,
it will deliver it via NJE through a DISTRIBUTE job to a LISTSERV sitting
on both networks.
Eric
|
|
|