For several day mail from [log in to unmask], a list I co-own
and manage, has arrived in a totally erratic pattern. On occasions,
responses get to me hours before the original post, and in general,
messages take from a few minutes to close to 24 hours to arrive. I
just received a message I sent out to the list yesterday afternoon
(I ma set repro).
I am appending an interesting example. Yesterday one of my
subscribers accidentally sent out an incomplete draft of the "New
Priest" post (Post A) at Mon, 25 Sep 1995 10:41:23 EDT and the
complete message (Post B) at Mon, 25 Sep 1995 10:41:18 EDT. Note
that the time difference is a matter of 5 seconds! Post A arrived
here at 26-SEP-1995 07:29:03.34 (Central Time) and Post B arrived
at 25-SEP-1995 12:17:36.54 (Central Time) about 19 hours earlier.
Is this happening to others?
I also have a commercial e-mail address ([log in to unmask]) and am
subscribed to Vatican2 there as well. Both messages arrived in the
ionet.net mailbox within minutes of each other yesterday, around
the time Post B arrived in my university account. My own message
was also posted to my commercial account yesterday. This indicates
to me that the bottleneck is in the route between Temple and the
USAO system as opposed to the route used between Temple and Ionet.
Any ideas?????
Frustrated, Ingrid ([log in to unmask])
____________________________________________________________________
From:SMTP%"[log in to unmask]" 26-SEP-1995 07:29:03.34
To: FACSHAFERI
CC:
Subj:Re: The New Priest
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 10:41:23 EDT
Reply-To: Assoc for rights of Catholics in church-arcc
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender: Assoc for rights of Catholics in church-arcc
<[log in to unmask]>
From: "James E. Biechler" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: The New Priest
To: Multiple recipients of list VATICAN2 <[log in to unmask]>
Yes, friends, I do believe the evidence is clear. Recently ordained priests
tend to see themselves as quite different from the people to whom they minister.
From:SMTP%"[log in to unmask]" 25-SEP-1995 12:17:36.54
To: FACSHAFERI
CC:
Subj:Re: The New Priest
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 10:41:18 EDT
Reply-To: Assoc for rights of Catholics in church-arcc
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender: Assoc for rights of Catholics in church-arcc
<[log in to unmask]>
From: "James E. Biechler" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: The New Priest
To: Multiple recipients of list VATICAN2 <[log in to unmask]>
Yes, friends, I do believe the newly ordained priests come to their ministry
with a militant attitude, what one correspondent to The Tablet (London) called
************************
I ran a traceroute but only know how to do it from this end, so it
doesn't indicate the route taken to USAO with mail FROM the Temple system,
unless it's simply the reverse (which I doubt). Here goes anyway:
_Data Length:
traceroute to VM.TEMPLE.EDU (155.247.14.2), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 192.146.206.1 (192.146.206.1) 0 ms 0 ms 10 ms
2 OklahomaCity-OUR1-i1.mid.net (128.242.36.1) 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms
3 204.233.91.7 (204.233.91.7) 10 ms 0 ms 0 ms
4 border4-hssi1-0.KansasCity.mci.net (204.70.43.5) 50 ms 50 ms 50 ms
5 core-fddi-1.KansasCity.mci.net (204.70.3.65) 60 ms 50 ms 50 ms
6 core2-hssi-2.WillowSprings.mci.net (204.70.1.82) 50 ms 50 ms 50 ms
7 core1-aip-4.WillowSprings.mci.net (204.70.1.61) 60 ms 60 ms 50 ms
8 core-hssi-3.Chicago.mci.net (204.70.1.85) 120 ms 100 ms 100 ms
9 core1-hssi-2.NorthRoyalton.mci.net (204.70.1.94) 60 ms 60 ms 60 ms
10 core1-hssi-3.WestOrange.mci.net (204.70.1.102) 60 ms 70 ms 70 ms
11 core-hssi-4.NewYork.mci.net (204.70.1.97) 160 ms 90 ms 70 ms
12 border2-fddi-0.NewYork.mci.net (204.70.3.18) 110 ms 210 ms 90 ms
13 sprint-nap.NewYork.mci.net (204.70.45.6) 70 ms 70 ms 70 ms
14 fd-0.enss218.t3.ans.net (192.157.69.4) 80 ms 80 ms 70 ms
15 t3-3.cnss32.New-York.t3.ans.net (140.222.32.4) 70 ms 80 ms 80 ms
16 cnss38.New-York.t3.ans.net (140.222.32.198) 110 ms 90 ms 80 ms
17 cnss1000.Philadelphia.t3.ans.net (199.222.50.98) 120 ms 100 ms 80 ms
18 129.250.201.213 (129.250.201.213) 100 ms 100 ms 90 ms
19 vm.temple.edu (155.247.14.2) 100 ms 90 ms 110 ms
20 * vm.temple.edu (155.247.14.2) 120 ms 120 ms
Thank you very much!
Ingrid ([log in to unmask])
|
