Can someone from L-Soft confirm that the errors need to exceed the Max()
number. This appears to make sense in light of what is going on on my list.


On Sun, 20 Jun 1999 02:20:04 -0500, Adam Bailey <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>I've found, at least on my LISTSERV, that a subscriber has to exceed the
>Max() number in order to be deleted. Although I've never tried to confirm
>that this is normal LISTSERV behavior.
>
>If you see someone get to three without being deleted, then you've got a
>case of an address generating errors that's not subscribed, either
>because of forwarding or local machine differences.