Thu, 3 Oct 1996 15:29:32 +0200
|
On Wed, 2 Oct 1996 13:00:54 -0700 Eric Paul-Hus
<[log in to unmask]>
said:
>But it happens with Banyan other PC LAN addresses in the form
>Myfirstname%MY_full_last_name%my_departmant%my_division%mailhost%our_gat
>[log in to unmask]
What is the likelihood of a normal user managing to type this address in
the "Send to:" field of his mail program without making a mistake? Does
its owner actually remember it? How does he go about letting other people
know at conferences that this is his address? Could there possibly be
something wrong or undesirable with this address?
>The only stupidity I see in the situation is the 80 char. card inherited
>from the punch card and still used on IBM VM/XA et al ...
If you want my opinion, the real stupidity when people state without any
knowledge of the subject that everything they want to do and that
LISTSERV cannot do is due to a stupid punch card legacy. As a matter of
fact, this is pretty much the same problem as the database that only
allocates 30 characters (or whatever) for the street address, and then my
address doesn't fit and gets truncated. LISTSERV allocates 80 characters
for the e-mail address, if it's bigger it doesn't fit. The entire record
is actually 100 bytes long, and I have yet to see a punch card that wide.
>And, if the LISTSERV is on VM than you need to limit much further
>because a mailed command is "one record" by line so I guess the working
>limit is closer to 60 char. unless there is a trick to use
>"continuation" lines.
You may not know anything about VM, but there are many people on this
list who do, and I'm afraid you've just made a fool out of yourself :-)
>Un drtle(*) de Quibicois errant sur la toile de l'Universiti de la
>vie...
>(*):Drtle dans le sens d'itrange pas de comique!
Hmm... :-)
Eric
|
|
|