I've been doing a little more detective work on this problem.
First, posts sent to the list (CANINE-L for example) directly to
the PCCVM node are posted properly, distributed properly to and by
the PSUVM peer, and generate no error messages (persuming the subscriber
has subbed the list at the PCCVM node, of course).
Posts sent directly to the PSUVM peer are also distributed to the list
OK, but generate the rejection/duplicate error message. The only thing
I can see that _might_ be doing this, from looking at the headers,
is the fact that posts are being frowarded from PSUVM to the PCCVM
list peer addressed to PCCVM.ICC.PCC.EDU. Somehow, a copy of
the post seems to being forwarded back again to PSUVM from PCCVM,
which looks like the cause of the problem.
I don't think the PCCVM.ICC.PCC.EDU node name is active at PCCVM,
although the headers look like mail to it gets handed off to
PCCVM.BITNET. The PCCVM.ICC.PCC.EDU node is unknown/unreachable from
here, although plain PCCVM works just fine.
Am I close? Is there a solution?
Note sample headers attached.
Thanks in advance.
W. K. (Bill) Gorman
List Owner: CANINE-L EQUINE-L FELINE-L
---------------------------------- ATTACHMENT -------------------------
>Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (NJE origin MAILER@PSUVM) by CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU
> (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 1463; Sat, 9 Jul 1994 11:45:13 -0400
>Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@PSUVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU
(LMail
> V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6630; Sat, 9 Jul 1994 11:44:51 -0400
>Date: Sat, 9 Jul 1994 11:44:51 -0400
>From: BITNET list server at PSUVM (1.8a) <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Rejected posting to CANINE-L@PSUVM
>To: "W. K. (Bill) Gorman" <[log in to unmask]>
>
>Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it seems to have been
>already sent to the CANINE-L list. That is, a message with identical body (but
>possibly different headers) has been posted to the list recently, either by you
>or by someone else. If you have a good reason to resend this message to the
>list (for instance because half of the outbound spool files were lost in a disk
>crash at some intermediate node), please alter the message text in some way
>before resending it. Note that altering the "Subject:" line or adding blank
>lines at the top or bottom of the message is not sufficient; you should instead
>add a line at the top explaining why you are re-sending the message, for the
>benefit of the list membership.
>
>------------------------- Rejected message (41 lines) -------------------------
>Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from PCCVM.ICC.PCC.EDU (NJE origin MAILER@PCCVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU
>(LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6628; Sat, 9 Jul 1994 11:44:51 -0400
>Received: from PCCVM.BITNET (NJE origin LISTSERV@PCCVM) by PCCVM.ICC.PCC.EDU
>(LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0883; Sat, 9 Jul 1994 08:46:37 -0700
>Received: from PCCVM.BITNET by PCCVM.BITNET (LISTSERV release 1.8a) with NJE id
> 5565 for [log in to unmask]; Sat, 9 Jul 1994 08:46:22 -0700
>Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (NJE origin MAILER@PSUVM) by PCCVM.ICC.PCC.EDU
> (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0879; Sat, 9 Jul 1994 08:46:18 -0700
>Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@PSUVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU
> (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6549; Sat, 9 Jul 1994 11:44:09 -0400
>Received: from PSUVM.BITNET by PSUVM.PSU.EDU (LISTSERV release 1.8a) with NJE
> id 2455 for [log in to unmask]; Sat, 9 Jul 1994 11:44:09 -0400
>Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (NJE origin MAILER@CMUVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU
> (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6546; Sat, 9 Jul 1994 11:44:08 -0400
>Received: from CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (NJE origin 34AEJ7D@CMUVM) by
> CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 1458; Sat,
> 9 Jul 1994 11:44:14 -0400
>Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
>Newsgroups: bit.listserv.canine-l
>Date: Sat, 9 Jul 1994 11:43:35 EDT
>Reply-To: Discussion forum for Dog fanciers <[log in to unmask]>
>Sender: Discussion forum for Dog fanciers <[log in to unmask]>
>Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was [log in to unmask]
>From: "W. K. (Bill) Gorman" <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: TEST: More testing/dup post bug stomping
>X-LSVRepTo:
>X-LSVopts: NOACK Org=CANINE-L@PCCVM
>X-LSVvia: CANINE-L@PSUVM CANINE-L@PCCVM
>X-LSVTo: [log in to unmask] CANINE-L Discussion List
>X-LSVTag: Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>X-LSVTag: Date: Sat, 09 Jul 94 11:43:35 EDT
>X-LSVTag: From: "W. K. (Bill) Gorman" <[log in to unmask]>
>X-LSVTag: Subject: TEST: More testing/dup post bug stomping
>X-LSVTag: To: CANINE-L Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
>X-LSVTag: Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
>To: $PEER$ <[log in to unmask]>
>
>Please ignore this test post.
|
