Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:03:15 -0400
|
On 22 Sep 2005 at 16:43, Kevin Parris wrote:
> If you consider the majority of your subscribers to be trustworthy,
> and you already have the "risky" ones set to REVIEW, I would suggest
> these options:
>
> Default-Options= Review (plus any other selections you may have)
> so all new subscribers will be moderated, until you
> find them worthy of NoReview
Most subscribers who've made a couple of non-spammy, non-axe-murderous posts
are set to Noreview. Now though, they're being sent to me for redirection and I can't
understand why. Does anyone know?
> Send= Private
> so only subscribers may post to the list
>
Can't do it. There's a gateway to and from a usenet newsgroup. Setting it to
"Send= private" basically shuts down the gateway.
> and specify ONLY individual email-addresses in the Editor= keyword,
> NOT the listname. If you specify the listname as an Editor, that
> causes the review/noreview subscriber options to be ignored entirely
> by the server - it means all subscribers are Editors and, with the
> current version of the software, an Editor is not subject to Review.
Anybody else have a gated list?
Maureen
>
> >>> [log in to unmask] 9/22/2005 3:40:40 PM >>>
> [snip]
> Stinky huh? Happened to me too. Still happening. I have no idea as to
> what to do, after 10 years of doing my list. Setting it up without the
> Editor= me@myplace, (listname-l) leaves me with all subscriber mail,
> even those who're set to noreview, coming to me to be redirected to
> the list. (i.e. reviewed/manually redirected to the list.)
>
> I have tried reading the manual at lsoft.com, specifically the parts
> relating to the Send= header keyword, but nothing makes sense to me.
>
> But anyway, that's probably what's happening to your list too.
>
> Maureen
>
|
|
|