Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:14:37 -0500
|
On Feb 3, 2005, at 9:26 PM, Charles Oriez wrote:
> At 06:53 PM 2/3/2005, Stan Horwitz wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Charles Oriez wrote:
>>
>> >running v1.8e
>> >
>> >I had a user who seems to be properly subscribed to a list get a
>> reject
>> >message saying that he wasn't authorized to post to the list from his
>> >address. The address he tried to post from is the same as the
>> address that
>> >shows for him when I query the subscriber base, except that the
>> address was
>> >in lower case on the list and his from address on his email was in
>> upper
>> >case. NOPOST and REVIEW are not set in his configuration.
>> >
>> >I always thought that email addresses were case insensitive for
>> purposes of
>> >deciding whether someone was subscribed or not, but I can't come up
>> with
>> >any other explanations for why he had trouble posting. Any other
>> bright ideas?
>>
>> Its hard to say without seeing the header of the rejected message.
>> How
>> was this subscription added to your list? Perhaps the problem can be
>> solved by deleting the subscription and then allowing the person to
>> subscribe again so that you're sure this person's correct email is
>> captured by Listserv.
>
> he's been subscribed since Jan of last year, but this is the first
> time that he's tried to post
>
> incidentally, I was wrong. His address was all lower case both in the
> from address and in the list subscription database
>
> I'll mail you the reject off list along with a picture of his
> subscription
>
>
>
> --
> [log in to unmask] 39 34' 34.4"N / 105 00' 06.3"W AIM
> handle caoriez
> Sturgeon's Law as applied to discussion lists:
> Axiom #3: "Sturgeon's Law (90% of everything is crap) applies to
> discussion lists."
> Corollary #5: "In an unmoderated discussion, no one can agree on what
> constitutes the 10%."
> Corollary #6: "Nothing guarantees that the 10% isn't crap, too."
|
|
|