Fri, 8 Dec 2006 19:55:57 -0500
|
On: Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 07:45:26PM -0500,Rich Greenberg Wrote:
} On: Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 05:41:39PM -0600,Winship Wrote:
}
} } On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Rich Greenberg wrote:
} } > Periodically (basically whenever I think of it) I send in the following
} } > to Apple:
} } > // job pw=xxxxxxxx
} } > review chinook-l all
} } > query chinook-l for *@*
} } > review sibernet-l all
} } > query sibernet-l for *@*
} } > // eoj
} }
} } Just wondering, why are you sending it that way? Why not simply send it
} } as:
} } review chinook-l all
} } query chinook-l for *@*
} } review sibernet-l all
} } query sibernet-l for *@*
} }
} } without the old "job" stuff? LISTSERV has accepted "stacked" commands
} } for more years than I can recall. The only problem I has found is if
} } you include a list archive search you need to be sure to put it last;
} } if it is first it is the only one which will be processed.
}
} No particular reason except habit. Does REVIEW or QUERY need a
} password?
Aparantly it doesn't because I just tried it. And this time the one
thats usually last is last. So I am guessing that its random with the
largest one usually coming in last.
O well. At least I have removed a bug from my analysis program.
--
Rich Greenberg N Ft Myers, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 239 543 1353
Eastern time. N6LRT I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67
Canines:Val, Red, Shasta & Casey (RIP), Red & Zero, Siberians Owner:Chinook-L
Retired at the beach Asst Owner:Sibernet-L
|
|
|