Eric Thomas <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> This is almost as stupid as rejecting messages because they do not
> appear to be written in English. In the case of leading white space,
> it also shows a fundamental lack of understanding of RFC822. Leading
> white space is not significant, very much like the stamp that the
> post office puts on your letter


It may not be significant as far as the RFC goes, but it IS a
significant indicator of spam.  That's one of the reasons that
SpamAssassin's default score for "too much white space in subject" has a
score high enough to get a message 1/2 way to "spam level".


+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Chris Barnes                           AOL IM: CNBarnes
[log in to unmask]                Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes
Computer Systems Manager               MSN IM: [log in to unmask]
Department of Physics                      ph: 979-845-7801
Texas A&M University                      fax: 979-845-2590