Mon, 21 Aug 1995 01:50:23 -0400
|
I misserd all of this, but I too am turning my materials over to a
lawyer as it is the better way as Eric pointed out. -- Paul.
> This is just a reminder that, in a few hours, we, the members of the
> "Keep LST*-L Clean" class action suit ("We"), will be expecting (1) ALL
> discussions related to spams, other than side comments that are (i)
> short, (ii) to the point and (iii) non-soapboxish in nature, to take
> place on the new SPAM-L list. In particular, We will be expecting (2) all
> copies of spams that We may have been unfortunate enough to miss due to
> the spam filter getting in the way of our collective enjoyment to be
> reposted exclusively to SPAM-L. Let it hereby be known that (3) We have
> obtained a restraining order allowing us to actually kick people off
> either or both list, or any combination thereof, for a period of 1 (one)
> week if We see (i) spams forwarded to LSTSRV-L or LSTOWN-L or (ii) "I saw
> it on XYZ-L as well!" messages resulting from unfortunate occurrences of
> the actions described in Section 3(i), or any reasonable interpretation
> thereof, including, without limitation, the "Delete First And Ask
> Questions Later" act of 1986, and its subsequent revisions.
>
> Eric
>
- --
Dr. Paul S. di Virgilio, University of Toronto [log in to unmask]
|
|
|