Dan Lester wrote:
 
[major snip]
 
> If Aldo is bitching merely about the .sig, he's way off base.  If he's
> kicked her off for posting marketing crap after warnings, he's on base.
> But, I, and obviously most, read it as complaining only about the .sig.
 
Well, unlike the other wimps who retracted their posts after spending
an hour or two researching her organization and posts, I refuse to
be apologetic for my post.
 
It was up to Aldo to provide evidence for his claim, not make us
go find it, and not only did he fail to do that, he posted what
was clearly private email (rather than, say, a post to his mailing
list that he felt didn't belong there, which would be something
already public).  So he made himself out to be a "bad guy" and
I still view him that way for having done that.
 
So, no apologies to anyone; I think both sides are "guilty", and
now I'm exiting this thread  :-)
 
Cheers,
Stan.