You need to enclose the address in quotes or use carefully-selected
wildcards. Try this:
quiet del vatican2 "[log in to unmask]"
Note... check their entry in your member list and copy from there to be
sure you get it exactly right.
Steve Pruitt
>----------
>From: Ingrid H. Shafer[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Friday, December 27, 1996 8:07 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: HELP! How can I delete this(?) subscriber?????
>
>From: SMTP%"[log in to unmask]" 27-DEC-1996 00:57:28.63
>To: FACSHAFERI
>CC:
>Subj: VATICAN2: error report from MAIL.ATT.NET
>
>Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 01:58:03 -0500
>From: "L-Soft list server at TEMPLEVM (1.8b)"
><[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: VATICAN2: error report from MAIL.ATT.NET
>To: Ingrid Shafer <[log in to unmask]>
>X-LSV-ListID: None
>
>The enclosed mail file has been identified as a delivery error for list
>VATICAN2 because it was sent to the reserved 'owner-vatican2' mailbox.
>
>------------------------------ Message in error
>-------------------------------
>Received: from TEMPLEVM (NJE origin SMTP@TEMPLEVM) by VM.TEMPLE.EDU (LMail
> V1.2b/1.8b) with BSMTP id 3384; Fri, 27 Dec 1996 01:58:03 -0500
>Received: from moau.mo.br.np.els-gms.att.net by VM.TEMPLE.EDU (IBM VM SMTP
>V2R3)
> with TCP; Fri, 27 Dec 96 01:58:01 EST
>Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 06:57:36 +0000
>Original-Received: from internet !VM.TEMPLE.EDU ([155.247.14.2])
> by moau.mo.br.np.els-gms.att.net with SMTP ID 0vdWEU.2CgPE8;
> Fri, 27 Dec 1996 06:57:30 +0000
>Original-Date: Fri Dec 27 01:49:10 -0500 1996
>Original-Subject: Re: Gerard, please!
>Confirming-MTS-Message-ID: <internet15410mo050003620657360>
>Tracking-Message: no
>Not-Delivered-To: [log in to unmask] due to code
>01
> "Invalid Address Specification";
> arrived Fri, 27 Dec 1996 06:57:30 +0000;
> Supplementary-info " Destination cannot accept ISO8859.1 content."
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: message/rfc822
>From: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Email Nondelivery Notice -- FAILED MESSAGE
>
>Original-Date: Fri Dec 27 01:49:10 -0500 1996
>Original-Subject: Re: Gerard, please!
>Confirming-MTS-Message-ID: <internet15410mo050003620657360>
>Not-Delivered-To: [log in to unmask] due to code
>01
> "Invalid Address Specification";
> arrived Fri, 27 Dec 1996 06:57:30 +0000;
> Supplementary-info " Destination cannot accept ISO8859.1 content."
>
>X-ATT-UNIX-Postmark: >From smtp Fri Dec 27 06:57:30 +0000 1996 remote from
> internet
>X-ATT-UNIX-Postmark: >From owner-vatican2 Fri Dec 27 06:57:30 +0000 1996
>remote
> from VM.TEMPLE.EDU
>Received: from internet !VM.TEMPLE.EDU ([155.247.14.2])
> by moau.mo.br.np.els-gms.att.net with SMTP ID 0vdWEU.2CgPE8;
> Fri, 27 Dec 1996 06:57:30 +0000
>Received: from VM.TEMPLE.EDU by VM.TEMPLE.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R3)
> with BSMTP id 4045; Fri, 27 Dec 96 01:56:41 EST
>Received: from VM.TEMPLE.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@TEMPLEVM) by VM.TEMPLE.EDU
> (LMail V1.2b/1.8b) with BSMTP id 3358; Fri, 27 Dec 1996 01:56:41 -0500
>Received: from VM.TEMPLE.EDU by VM.TEMPLE.EDU (LISTSERV release 1.8b) with
>NJE
> id 1773 for [log in to unmask]; Fri, 27 Dec 1996 01:56:40 -0500
>Received: from TEMPLEVM (NJE origin SMTP@TEMPLEVM) by VM.TEMPLE.EDU (LMail
> V1.2b/1.8b) with BSMTP id 3338; Fri, 27 Dec 1996 01:55:34 -0500
>Received: from enterprise.america.com by VM.TEMPLE.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R3)
>with
> TCP; Fri, 27 Dec 96 01:55:33 EST
>Received: from default by enterprise.america.com with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #9)
> id m0vdWCH-001w41C; Fri, 27 Dec 96 01:55 EST
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Priority: 3
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
>Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: Fri Dec 27 01:49:10 -0500 1996
>Reply-To: [log in to unmask] (ARCC (Assn Rights Catholics Church))
>Sender: [log in to unmask] (ARCC (Assn Rights Catholics Church))
>From: [log in to unmask] (Michael K. Cronin)
>Subject: Re: Gerard, please!
>To: [log in to unmask] (Multiple recipients of list VATICAN2)
>Encoding-Type: ISO8859.1
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Ingrid:
>
>Vatican2 is a first-class, forward-thinking list that certainly ranks among
>the very best. But I wonder whether we serve the cause of democratization
>by excluding those who also "give a damn" about the church but come at it
>from a different angle.
>
>I can appreciate the argument that "we shouldn't have to justify our very
>existence". At the same time if we're going to be successful we're going to
>have to mix with and "sell" our views on democratization to those who think
>differently.
>
>At the risk of being judgmental, I thought I saw a good man in Gerard, an
>intensely caring Catholic, someone who wanted to learn more about Vatican
>II as well as contribute some of his own thinking from his own background.
>Vatican2 argues cogently for more diversity, tolerance, and fresh thinking
>in the church -- yet demands a certain conformity internally.
>
>Shouldn't the groundrules be loosened up a bit so that we can attract,
>keep, and influence the Gerards of the world? It would seem to be in the
>interests of Vatican2.
>
>Mike Cronin
>Ormond Beach, FL
>
|
