is performance an issue if its just a straightforward distribution
list(big)?   is there an alternative way to doing it?

thnks,
omr/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: LISTSERV give-and-take forum
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ben Parker
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:27 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Setting the To: address
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:01:41 -0500, Dave <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> >Thanks, I didn't see this option. It's exactly what I want, however,
> >I'm scared by the strong warnings in the manual.
>
> They are there for reason.
>
> >Will performance with this option be any worse than using a
> DISTRIBUTE
> >MAIL-MERGE job?
>
> For 10 recipients, no.  For 100 or 500, or 1000, the yes.
> Each gets progressively worse.  DIST Mail-Merge will be the
> beste method.
>