Some of the files sent from a list (CHINA-ND) at our node is producing
bad Reply-To: field which is impossible for the receiver to reply to.
I have included the header as follows:
 
>Received: from Csa3.LBL.Gov by fionn.lbl.gov (4.1/1.39)
>        id AA09777; Thu, 12 Apr 90 07:00:27 PDT
>Received: from UCBCMSA.BITNET by Lbl.Bitnet with BSMTP via BITNET ;
>        Thu, 12 Apr 90 06:58:10 PDT
>Received: From UCBCMSA(MAILER) by LBL with Jnet id 6506
>          for MAILER@LBL; Thu, 12 Apr 90 06:58 PST
>Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: by UCBCMSA (Mailer R2.04) id 9341; Thu, 12 Apr 90 06:57:49 PDT
>Date:         Wed, 11 Apr 90 22:06:06 -0700
>Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
>Sender: [log in to unmask]
>From: [log in to unmask]
>Subject:      NDUS-Visa, New Executive Order
>To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask],
>        [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
 
[log in to unmask] is the intended receiver.  For some reason,
Berkeley.EDU is appended to the sender which is [log in to unmask]
The receiver said he gets this kind of header from a few other lists
he is subscribed to, also.  He could however reply to a mail that I
sent him with the same address.
 
Could anyone tell me what we can do to fix this?
 
Christine Shih
SHIH@KENTVM