Peter,
You're obviously right but what does this have to do with PEERS NAMES and
the impossibility to store it on release 1.5h servers? At present PEERS NAMES
is only 350 records or so in Netdata format and we're not yet forced to use an
update concept -- please remember that UPDNODES is very slow and requires a
lot of OS storage. We also don't have a checksum system yet. Anyway I don't
think this is our most important problem right now.
Eric