Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LSTSRV-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LSTSRV-L Home LSTSRV-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Node Administrator and Netwide support
From:
"Michael R. Gettes" <GETTES@PUCC>
Reply To:
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@CEARN>
Date:
Sun, 10 Sep 89 13:38:37 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Public question to the author of LISTSERV:
 
Would  it be  a major  problem if  instead of  putting new  functionality into
listserv as  you have time  to work  on it you  were to begin  documenting the
existing functionality? I have the feeling that if you documented half as well
as you  can code  -- it  would be awesome!  This, of  course, would  allow for
others  to participate  in  the development  of listserv  with  you being  the
coordinator (or  someone else). Yes,  I am aware  of the problems  this brings
about, but  Eric, you  are but  one individual, and  ONE can  only do  so much
(albeit a  lot, but not everything!).  Included in the documentation  would be
the user point of view, the technical perspective, and insight as to how other
releases  work so  people  can  realize what  would  break an  older/different
listserv. We all hate documentation, but would you be willing to do this?
 
/mrg

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV