LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Nick Abiola-Bisiolu <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 11 May 2007 12:14:50 -0400
text/plain (94 lines)
We are running the latest version of Sendmail commercial version (Sendmail 
Switch) and both Listserv and sendmail are running on the same box.
Listserv passes delivery to the sendmail application for delivery to all 
subscribers.
We have configured the Listserv go.user to use the SMTP_FORWARD to the 
sendmail application on the server.
We are not using BSMTP.

Thanks,
Nick

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christopher Wilson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: Listserv multiple message


> What sendmail version?
> Is this with sendmail running on the same box as Listserv?
> How is Listserv handling the delivery?
> Single-threaded delivery or SMTP helpers?
> Are you using BSMTP?
>
> -Chris
>
> Nick Abiola-Bisiolu wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am wondering if anyone is having similar experince with Listserv where 
>> messages send to a very large list get resend a second time to some of 
>> the recipientsc by sendmail due to unknown email addresses retuned by the 
>> server local alias table.
>> We have configured our Listserv server in Unix environment and all our 
>> staff aliases are resolvable by the Listserv server.
>> According to Lsoft technical support, we have to modify some setting in 
>> sendmail timeout to fix the issue, but they have not benn specific about 
>> the changes.
>>
>> During email distribution from Listserv, we noted that some of the 
>> recipients addreses that are bad are reported back instantly to Listserv 
>> by the server alias deamon as shown below.
>>
>> 9 May 2007 15:01:27 Processed     700 recipients...
>> 9 May 2007 15:01:28 Processed     800 recipients...
>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]>
>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown
>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]>
>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown
>> 9 May 2007 15:01:28 Processed     900 recipients...
>> 9 May 2007 15:01:28 Processed    1000 recipients...
>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]>
>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown
>> 9 May 2007 15:01:28 Processed    1100 recipients...
>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]>
>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown
>> 9 May 2007 15:01:28 Processed    1200 recipients...
>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]>
>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown
>> 9 May 2007 15:01:28 Processed    1300 recipients...
>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]>
>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown
>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]>
>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown
>> 9 May 2007 15:01:29 Processed    1400 recipients...
>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]>
>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown
>> 9 May 2007 15:01:29 Processed    1500 recipients...
>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]>
>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown
>> -> RCPT TO:<[log in to unmask]>
>> 550 5.1.1 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown
>> 9 May 2007 15:01:30 Processed    1600 recipients...
>> 9 May 2007 15:01:30 Processed    1700 recipients...
>>
>> In Sendmail log the same message was generated twice to the same list 
>> with differennt message ID and each list of recipients are identical 
>> starting with the bad addreses.
>>
>> Please respond with any helpful information.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nick
>
> -- 
> Christopher Wilson
> Information Systems Coordinator
> ISS Technology Operations and Engineering
> The George Washington University
> 202-994-3878
> [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2