LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Jim Cocks <[log in to unmask]>
Mon, 1 Aug 1994 16:32:26 EDT
text/plain (87 lines)
I'm completely new to the nuances of peered lists.  The list HISTORY
has a number of peers and is currently experiencing the phenomena
whereby when a message is posted to one of the peers the rest complain
that the post they are to distribute is a duplicate.  Attached below
is an example of a typical complaint.  Can anyone give me some direction
on clearing this up?  I would be greatly appreciated.
 
Thanks,
 
  --Jim Cocks  Univ. of Louisville  <[log in to unmask]>
 
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
 
From [log in to unmask] Mon Aug  1 14:55:15 1994
Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (psuvm.psu.edu [128.118.56.2]);
           by Tut.MsState.Edu using SMTP (8.6.9/6.5m-FWP);
           id OAA23414; Mon, 1 Aug 1994 14:55:12 -0500
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU by PSUVM.PSU.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 5898; Mon, 01 Aug 94 15:42:14 EDT
Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@PSUVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4211; Mon, 1 Aug 1994 14:42:19 -0400
Date:         Mon, 1 Aug 1994 14:42:19 -0400
From: BITNET list server at PSUVM (1.8a) <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Rejected posting to HISTORY@PSUVM
To: [log in to unmask]
Status: RO
 
Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it seems to have been
already sent to the  HISTORY list. That is, a message  with identical body (but
possibly different headers) has been posted to the list recently, either by you
or by  someone else. If you  have a good reason  to resend this message  to the
list (for instance because half of the outbound spool files were lost in a disk
crash at  some intermediate node),  please alter the  message text in  some way
before resending  it. Note that  altering the  "Subject:" line or  adding blank
lines at the top or bottom of the message is not sufficient; you should instead
add a line  at the top explaining  why you are re-sending the  message, for the
benefit of the list membership.
 
------------------------- Rejected message (56 lines) -------------------------
Return-Path: <@RUTVM1.RUTGERS.EDU:[log in to unmask]>
Received: from RUTVM1.RUTGERS.EDU (NJE origin MAILER@RUTVM1) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU (L
Mail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4202; Mon, 1 Aug 1994 14:42:15 -0400
Received: from RUTVM1.RUTGERS.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@RUTVM1) by RUTVM1.RUTGERS
.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 4404; Mon, 1 Aug 1994 14:42:04 -0400
Received: from RUTVM1.BITNET by RUTVM1.RUTGERS.EDU (LISTSERV release 1.7f) with
          NJE id 4475 for [log in to unmask]; Mon,
          1 Aug 1994 14:42:01 -0400
Return-Path: <@RUTVM1.RUTGERS.EDU:[log in to unmask]>
Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (NJE origin MAILER@PSUVM) by RUTVM1.RUTGERS.EDU
          (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 4400; Mon, 1 Aug 1994 14:41:59 -0400
Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@PSUVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU
          (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4117; Mon, 1 Aug 1994 14:41:50 -0400
Received: from PSUVM.BITNET by PSUVM.PSU.EDU (LISTSERV release 1.8a) with NJE
          id 6796 for [log in to unmask]; Mon, 1 Aug 1994 14:41:49 -0400
Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from PSUVM (NJE origin SMTP@PSUVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU (LMail
          V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4115; Mon, 1 Aug 1994 14:41:49 -0400
Received: from Tut.MsState.Edu by PSUVM.PSU.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP;
          Mon, 01 Aug 94 14:41:46 EDT
Received: from Ra.MsState.Edu ([log in to unmask] [130.18.80.10]); by
          Tut.MsState.Edu using SMTP (8.6.9/6.5m-FWP); id LAA03663; Mon,
          1 Aug 1994 11:58:35 -0500
Received:  (djm1@localhost); by Ra.MsState.Edu (8.6.8.1/6.0c-FWP); id LAA28061;
           Mon, 1 Aug 1994 11:58:32 -0500
Message-ID:   <[log in to unmask]>
Newsgroups:   bit.listserv.history
Date:         Mon, 1 Aug 1994 11:58:32 -0500
Reply-To:     History Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       History Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was [log in to unmask]
From:         Don Mabry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Africa
X-LSVRepTo:
X-LSVopts: ACK Org=HISTORY@RUTVM1
X-LSVvia: HISTORY@PSUVM HISTORY@RUTVM1
X-LSVTo: [log in to unmask]
X-LSVTag: Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
X-LSVTag: From: Don Mabry <[log in to unmask]>
X-LSVTag: Date: Mon, 1 Aug 1994 11:58:32 -0500
X-LSVTag: Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
X-LSVTag: To: [log in to unmask]
X-LSVTag: Subject: Africa
To:           $PEER$ <[log in to unmask]>
 
  <  Rest of message deleted  >

ATOM RSS1 RSS2