And why doesn't "ASYNCH_SMTP=1" achieve the same effect? Or does it? We have
had that statement in our go.user file for 2 years.

-- pdr

Paul Russell wrote:
>
> In the discussion of the SMTP_FORWARD_n statement, the Site Manager's
> Manual states:
>
>         You MUST define an SMTP_FORWARD= parameter in the site
>         configuration file which will tell LISTSERV where to deliver
>         mail synchronously should asynchronous delivery fail for any
>         reason.
>
> Is this required, when the SMTP_FORWARD_n statement is being used in the
> manner described in the FAQ?
>