OK, which of these
-r-xr-xr-x   1 owner    group         4715430 May 24 17:24 Linux.bin
-r-xr-xr-x   1 owner    group         3086171 May 25 12:52 Linux.tar.Z
-r-xr-xr-x   1 owner    group         3045039 May 25 12:52 Linux-2.6.tar.Z
-r-xr-xr-x   1 owner    group         4735910 May 24 17:24 Linux-RH7.bin
-r-xr-xr-x   1 owner    group         3110549 May 25 12:52 Linux-RH7.tar.Z

do I use for
Linux version 2.4.21-32.EL ([log in to unmask]) (gcc
version 3.2.
3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-52)) #1 Fri Apr 15 21:29:19 EDT 2005

Thanks?

--
Jean Snow  Production Systems Support
Enterprise Information Technology Services
University of Georgia

On Thu, 26 May 2005, John Kelley wrote:

> Though my kernel is post 2.4, it turns out Red Hat Enterprise systems need
> to use the RH7 version of wa.
> I'm all set now.
>
> John
>
> At 08:38 AM 5/26/2005, Hiler, John wrote:
>>  I think it is a scam to get you to put an exploit on your system.
>> What does the Lsoft support staff say?
>>
>>
>> John Hiler
>> 513-229-1131 Work
>> 513-325-7572 Cell
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: LISTSERV site administrators' forum
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 8:09 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [Fwd: High Risk Vulnerability in L-Soft's LISTSERV Server]
>>
>> "LISTSERV site administrators' forum" <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote on 05/25/2005 09:48:42 PM:
>>
>> > Here's what I see and Linux.bin is still from yesterday, I trie
>> Linux.Tar.Z
>> > but also no-go.
>>
>> hte original advisory indicated a compile date of 5/24 had the fix.
>