On 17 Aug 95 at 19:47, Mark_Strawcutter wrote:
 
> >What we have to do is be ready to stuff his PO box, his real home
> >address mail box, and tie up his phones the next time he hits.  If
> >his figures are correct, and we can get a good portion of our
> >subscribers to participate in a concerted effort, we should be able
> >to get him in his wallet.
 
> I agree such activities would be annoying, but how would they "get
> him in his wallet"?  By keeping real customers from being able to
> reach him?
 
You also now become as bad as he is by participating in harrasing
activities.  Just because your motives are better does not make the
actions acceptable.