 
Robert Carr <C130RDC@UTARLVM1>
Wed, 22 Mar 89 01:13:51 CST
|
In the past, I have had problems receiving AFD'd files from LISTSERV
at BITNIC, so I did an AFD for XMAILER NAMES from NETSERV at TCSVM.
Well, this morning I received XMAILER NAMES from NETSERV at TCSVM
AND from LISTSERV at BITNIC! I expected the files to be the same.
When I noticed that the copy from NETSERV was 12 records longer, I
started digging a little deeper. The copy from L@B had 1 record
not in the copy from [log in to unmask] The copy from N@T had 13 records not
in the copy from [log in to unmask] Comparing records for each node, I discovered
numerous discrepancies, some minor but many that I think are
critical to the proper functioning of XMAILER and LISTSERV. I
have included the results of my comparison below. Which is the
'true' copy of XMAILER NAMES? Or are these 'differences' of no
real significance to the functioning of the network?
Robert Carr
Manager of Systems Programming
BITNET: C130RDC@UTARLVM1
Missing records:
NETSERV at TCSVM LISTSERV at BITNIC
------------------------- -------------------------
DS0RUS1P ? missing ? :net.EARN
ARIADNE :net.EARN ? missing ?
DHDSPRI6 :net.EARN ? missing ?
DOSUNI1 :net.EARN ? missing ?
DS0RUS56 :net.EARN ? missing ?
FRESCP11 :net.EARN ? missing ?
FRMAP711 :net.EARN ? missing ?
GRATHDEM :net.EARN ? missing ?
GRTHEUN1 :net.EARN ? missing ?
IBOENEA :net.EARN ? missing ?
IRMENEA :net.EARN ? missing ?
ISSUNIV :net.EARN ? missing ?
LINKS903 :net.BITNET ? missing ?
VERS8903 :net.EARN ? missing ?
':mailer.' tag discrepancies:
NETSERV at TCSVM LISTSERV at BITNIC
------------------------- -------------------------
BANUFS11 :mailer.MAILER BSMTP 3 :mailer.MAILER
BATATA :mailer.SMTP@HUJICS BSMTP 3 :mailer.
BLEKUL14 :mailer.MAILER DEFRT 1 :mailer.MAILER DEFRT 2
DBORUB01 :mailer. :mailer.MAILER
DFRRUF1 :mailer. :mailer.PROFS
DHAFEU11 :mailer.MAILER BSMTP 3 :mailer.MAILER BSMTP
DHDIBM1 :mailer. :mailer.MAILER DEFRT 1
DHDURZ1 :mailer.MAILER :mailer.MAILER DEFRT 1
ELEULE11 :mailer.MAILER DEFRT 1 :mailer.
FINOU :mailer.MAILER :mailer.MAILER DEFRT 1
FRFUPL11 :mailer.MAILER :mailer.
HDETUD51 :mailer. :mailer.EARNADM@HDETUD51
HDETUD52 :mailer. :mailer.?@HDETUD52 DEFRT 1 TRUNCATE
HDETUD53 :mailer. :mailer.BART@HDETUD53
HGRRUG0 :mailer.?@HGRRUG0 DEFRT 1 TRUNCATE :mailer.
HUJIFH :mailer.SMTP@HUJICS BSMTP 3 :mailer.
HUJINIX :mailer.MAILER@HUJIVMS BSMTP 3 :mailer.
HUMUS :mailer.SMTP@HUJICS BSMTP 3 :mailer.
HUTRUU0 :mailer.?@HUTRUU0 DEFRT 1 TRUNCATE :mailer.
ICINECA3 :mailer. :mailer.MAILER
IRMUNISA :mailer.MAILER :mailer.
JPNWAS00 :mailer.MAILER BSMTP 3 :mailer.MAILER BSMTP
LNCC :mailer.MAILER :mailer.MAILER BITNET 2
MCOIARC :mailer.MAILER BSMTP 3 :mailer.PMDF BSMTP 3
SEQZ51 :mailer.SMTPUSER :mailer.
TAURUS :mailer. :mailer.BSMTP BSMTP 3
TECHUNIX :mailer.MAILER BSMTP 3 :mailer.
TRENT :mailer.MAILER@TRENT BSMTP 3 :mailer.?@TRENT DEFRT 1 TRUNCATE
UALTAMTS :mailer.MAILER@UALTAMTS BITNET :mailer.?@UALTAMTS DEFRT 1 TRUNCATE
UOFMCC :mailer.MAILER@UOFMCC BSMTP 3 :mailer.MAILER@UOFMCC DEFRT 1 TRUNCATE
VNET :mailer.? NOMAIL 2 :mailer.? NOMAIL 2 VNET
VPFMVS :mailer.? NOMAIL 2 :mailer.? NOMAIL 2 VPFMVS
':alias.' tag discrepancies:
There are 324 records in the copy from L@B in which the ':alias.'
tag is null and the corresponding record in the copy from N@T has
an ':alias.' tag that matches the ':nick.' tag. In addition,
the following mismatches were noted:
NETSERV at TCSVM LISTSERV at BITNIC
------------------------- -------------------------
AECLCR :alias.AECLCR :alias.CRNL
DFVLRLA1 :alias.DLRVMLA :alias.
BNR :alias.BNR :alias.BNRVMNOR
DFVLRBS1 :alias.DLRVMBS :alias.DFVLRBS1
DFVLRGO1 :alias.DLRVMGO :alias.DFVLRGO1
DFVLRKP1 :alias.DLRVMKP :alias.DFVLRKP1
DFVLROP1 :alias.DLRVM :alias.DFVLROP1
DFVLROP2 :alias.DLRMVS :alias.DFVLROP2
DFVLRST1 :alias.DLRVMST :alias.DFVLRST1
EMDCCI11 :alias.EMDCCI11 :alias.EEARN
FINABO :alias.FINABO :alias.FOMABO
FRIBM11 :alias.FRIBM11 :alias.FRPOI11
UALTAMTS :alias.UALTAMTS :alias.UQVMTS
':netsoft.' tag discrepancies:
There are 175 records in the copy from L@B in which the ':netsoft.'
tag differs from the tag in the N@T copy only in case (L@B is all
UPPER case) or drops the first '.' (period) in a version field
(e.g.: 'JES2 1 3.6' instead of 'JES2 1.3.6'). There are 23 records
in the L@B copy with a null ':netsoft.' tag where the corresponding
record in the N@T copy has a value. In addition, the following
mismatches were noted:
NETSERV at TCSVM LISTSERV at BITNIC
------------------------- -------------------------
BGUNOS :netsoft.HUmail :netsoft.TIELINE
DBSNRV0 :netsoft.NRV/SML modified :netsoft.NRV
DD0RUD81 :netsoft.RCOM V4.2 :netsoft.RCOM
DERDBS5 :netsoft.ANL NJE :netsoft.ANJE
DFVLROP2 :netsoft.JES2 2.2.0 :netsoft.JES2 2 2.1
DGATUM5P :netsoft.ANL NJE :netsoft.ANJE
DGHGKSS4 :netsoft.JES2 2.1.7 :netsoft.JES2 2 1.5
DMARUM8 :netsoft.NJE-Simulation :netsoft.NJE
DOSUNI :netsoft.Transdata :netsoft.TRANSDAT
DS0RUS0 :netsoft.INTERCOM 5 :netsoft.INTERCOM
EVALUN11 :netsoft.RSCS V.2 R 2.0 :netsoft.RSCS
GRCRUN11 :netsoft.RSCS V2 R4 :netsoft.RSCS V1 R3
GREARN :netsoft.RSCS V2 R4 :netsoft.RSCS V1 R3
HBUNOS :netsoft.HUmail :netsoft.TIELINE
HBUNOS :netsoft.HUmail :netsoft.TIELINE
HUJINOS2 :netsoft.HUJI Mailer :netsoft.HUJI
HUJIVMS :netsoft.HUJI-NJE :netsoft.HUJI-RMF
HUMUS :netsoft.RMF :netsoft.HUJI-RMF
IBAINFN :netsoft.RSCS V 1 :netsoft.IBM 6031
ICINECA1 :netsoft.NJEF 2.3 :netsoft.NJEF
IFIBDP :netsoft.RSCS V2 :netsoft.VTAM V3 R1
SASK :netsoft.JNET 3 2 :netsoft.JNET 3 2:COUNTRY CAN
TAUNOS :netsoft.HUmail :netsoft.TIELINE
TAURUS :netsoft.UREP 3 :netsoft.UREP
TRENT :netsoft.JNET 3.1/PMDF 2.4 :netsoft.JNET
TUNS :netsoft.NJEF :netsoft.JNET
UALTAMTS :netsoft.RM :netsoft.HOMEBREW
UKACRL :netsoft.IBM RSCS V2.2 :netsoft.RSCS V1
UOTADM02 :netsoft.JNET :netsoft.RSCS
UTORGPU :netsoft.UREP 2.0 :netsoft.UREP
UTORSCG :netsoft.RSCS :netsoft.JNET
VOLCANI :netsoft.JNET 3.2 :netsoft.JA JNET 3 2
|
|
|
