LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Frank Laurijssens <[log in to unmask]>
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 21:05:47 +0100
text/plain (124 lines)
See http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0822.txt. 

For comments about long header fields, take special notice of section 3.1.1. 

According to RFC 822, header fields have been defined as follows (* means multiple, 1* means multiple, at least one):

     field       =  field-name ":" [ field-body ] CRLF

     field-name  =  1*<any CHAR, excluding CTLs, SPACE, and ":">

     field-body  =  field-body-contents
                    [CRLF LWSP-char field-body]

     field-body-contents =
                   <the ASCII characters making up the field-body, as
                    defined in the following sections, and consisting
                    of combinations of atom, quoted-string, and
                    specials tokens, or else consisting of texts>

     LWSP-char   =  SPACE / HTAB                 ; semantics = SPACE

     linear-white-space =  1*([CRLF] LWSP-char)  ; semantics = SPACE
                                                 ; CRLF => folding

Please note a little slip of the pen made by the author of the RFC: in section 3.1.1 and further on in the text, he's talking about AT LEAST one LWSP-char, so he creates the tag 'linear-white-space'. But, in field-body, he uses 'LWSP-char' where he meant linear-white-space.

So, to answer your first question, every header field, including the Subject: field, can be unlimited in length.

Please note that the syntax does not explicily allow for spaces between the colon and the field-body. Nevertheless, in the examples given in Appendix A of RFC 822 these spaces are there just like LSoft does:

     A.3.3.  About as complex as you're going to get

     Date     :  27 Aug 76 0932 PDT
     From     :  Ken Davis <[log in to unmask]>
     Subject  :  Re: The Syntax in the RFC
     Sender   :  KSecy@Other-Host
     Reply-To :  [log in to unmask]
     To       :  George Jones <[log in to unmask]>,
                 [log in to unmask]
     cc       :  Important folk:
                   Tom Softwood <[log in to unmask]>,
                   "Sam Irving"@Other-Host;,
                 Standard Distribution:
                   /main/davis/people/standard@Other-Host,
                   "<Jones>standard.dist.3"@Tops-20-Host>;
     Comment  :  Sam is away on business. He asked me to handle
                 his mail for him.  He'll be able to provide  a
                 more  accurate  explanation  when  he  returns
                 next week.
     In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>, George's message
     X-Special-action:  This is a sample of user-defined field-
                 names.  There could also be a field-name
                 "Special-action", but its name might later be
                 preempted
     Message-ID: <4231.629.XYzi-What@Other-Host>


To answer your second question, we have to look at section 4.1:

     message     =  fields *( CRLF *text )       ; Everything after
                                                 ;  first null line
                                                 ;  is message body

     fields      =    dates                      ; Creation time,
                      source                     ;  author id & one
                    1*destination                ;  address required
                     *optional-field             ;  others optional
     optional-field =
                 /  "Message-ID"        ":"   msg-id
                 /  "Resent-Message-ID" ":"   msg-id
                 /  "In-Reply-To"       ":"  *(phrase / msg-id)
                 /  "References"        ":"  *(phrase / msg-id)
                 /  "Keywords"          ":"  #phrase
                 /  "Subject"           ":"  *text
                 /  "Comments"          ":"  *text
                 /  "Encrypted"         ":" 1#2word
                 /  extension-field              ; To be defined
                 /  user-defined-field           ; May be pre-empted

Subject is an optional field, and there can be any number of optional fields. RFC 822 thus allows you to have more than one Subject: header.

Regards,

FrankL

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Ballew Kinnaman [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Verzonden: zaterdag 8 december 2001 21:38
> Aan: LSTSRV-L
> Onderwerp: Re: [LSTSRV-L] prepending spaces to the subject line
> 
> 
> Dear FrankL and LSTSRV-L Folks,
> 
> >line when the subject is too long to fit on one RFC822 header
> >line. It creates 'new' subjects and by doing that it spoils
> >threads in the archives.
> >
> >FrankL
> 
> Okay, I'll bite. How long does RFC 822 say your
> Subject: line can (or can't) be?
> 
> <smirk, scowl>
> 
> What is this software that creates a SECOND
> Subject: line for a single message? <!>
> 
> And, while we're at it, how does RFC 822 feel
> about having two or more Subject: lines on one
> message? That sounds like something RFC 822
> should be clear about...
> 
>  Pax,
> Ballew Kinnaman <[log in to unmask]> 206/463-2322
> Discussion list owner:
> Allergy ---> http://www.Immune.Com/allergy/index.html
> Arthritis ---> http://www.Emissary.Net/arthritis/index.html
> PCHealth ---> http://www.Emissary.Net/pchealth/index.html
> Latex Allergy ---> http://www.Immune.Com/rubber/index.html
> Thyroid ---> http://www.Emissary.Net/thyroid/index.html
> 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2