Thu, 2 May 2002 15:18:04 +0200
|
--On Thursday, May 02, 2002 07:54:13 -0400 Stan Horwitz <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2002, Bill Schipper wrote:
>
>> But I wouldn't just quietly delete them. Some @home.com addresses were
>> taken over by other ISPs, but with the domain name intact, so that you
>> could be deleting addresses that are still alive. If I were you I'd
>> pull a list of all the @home.com addresses, and send them all a brief
>> message. See how many come back undeliverable. Those you can delete.
>
> Why? Email to them will probably bounce anyway. Its not like the people
> who manage the various portions of the @Home network didn't send their
> customers prior notification of the shutdown. I was an @Home user and I
> received at least half a dozen notifications about the shut down and the
> need to change my email configuration. Some people just ignore such
> things. My feeling is that they now have to deal with the consequences
> or they can just continuing ignoring the issue, since some people probably
> don't even care about receiving any Listserv mail any longer.
>
Well, it bounces. I just removed my 15 subscribers.
Take the output from
query * for *@HOME.COM
and mangle it (sed, awk) to
quiet delete * <address>@HOME.com PW=supersecretpassword
and send that the right way...
--
Måns Nilsson Systems Specialist
+46 70 681 7204 KTHNOC MN1334-RIPE
We're sysadmins. To us, data is a protocol-overhead.
|
|
|