I did *not* repost this item, nor did I repost the other one with the
same Resent-Subject = "Any ideas, anyone?". What's going on?
REXXards. ;-)
Scott/
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it seems to have been
already sent to the REXXLIST list. That is, a message with identical body (but
possibly different headers) has been posted to the list recently, either by you
or by someone else. If you have a good reason to resend this message to the
list (for instance because half of the outbound spool files were lost in a disk
crash at some intermediate node), please alter the message text in some way
before resending it. Note that altering the "Subject:" line or adding blank
lines at the top or bottom of the message is not sufficient; you should instead
add a line at the top explaining why you are re-sending the message, for the
benefit of the list membership.
------------------------- Rejected message (33 lines) -------------------------
Received: from DEARN by OHSTVMA.IRCC.OHIO-STATE.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP
id 7215; Tue, 06 Nov 90 18:53:14 EST
Received: by DEARN (Mailer R2.07) id 9169; Wed, 07 Nov 90 00:52:32 CET
Received: from HEARN.BITNET by DEARN (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 0626; Tue,
06 Nov 90 16:48:26 CET
Received: by HEARN (Mailer R2.07) id 7769; Tue, 06 Nov 90 16:46:18 MET
Received: from HDEDH1.BITNET by HEARN.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 7736;
Tue, 06 Nov 90 16:43:54 MET
Received: from HDEDH1.BITNET (NADWL) by HDEDH1.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP
id 0790; Tue, 06 Nov 90 16:43:19 SET
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 90 16:42:18 SET
Reply-To: VM/SP REXX Language Discussion List <REXXLIST@DEARN>
Sender: VM/SP REXX Language Discussion List <REXXLIST@DEARN>
From: Scott Ophof <NADWL@HDEDH1>
Subject: re: IBM FORM SC26-4358-0
X-LSVRepTo:
X-LSVopts: NOACK Org=REXXLIST@HEARN
X-LSVvia: REXXLIST@HEARN REXXLIST@DEARN
To: $PEER$ <REXXLIST@OHSTVMA>
In-Reply-To: Message of Mon, 5 Nov 90 21:10:35 MEZ from <RZOTTO@DKNKURZ1>
On Mon, 5 Nov 90 21:10:35 MEZ Otto Stolz +49 7531 88 2645 said:
>...
>Outside SAA (and IBM), there are REXX implementations for several more
>platforms available, among them being "Personal REXX" (for MS-DOS),
>Uni-REXX (for Unix on many hardware platforms), and Amiga-REXX.
Has anyone heard of TREXX (Tandem)?
REXXards.
Scott/
|