LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Ferhat Djavidan <DJAVI@TRBOUN>
Thu, 25 Jan 90 13:11:29 TST
text/plain (45 lines)
.....................................
.....................................
.....................................
> Return-path: <NAD-TR@TREARN>
> Received: from TRBOUN by CY815.UCC.TRBOUN with BSMTP;
>           24 Jan 90 15:54:29 TST
> Received: from TRBOUN by TRBOUN (inbound name server)
>           with BSMTP; 24 Jan 90 15:53:33 TST
> Received: from TREARN (MAILER) by TRBOUN for <DJAVI@TRBOUN> via BITNet
                                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                               this is true.
 
>           with NJF id RSCS8397; 24 Jan 90 15:53:05 TST
> Received: from TREARN by TREARN.BITNET (Mailer R2.03B) with BSMTP id 9026; Wed
>  24 Jan 90 15:49:42 TUR
> Reply-To:     Turgut@trearn
> Sender:       Node Administrators of Turkey <NAD-TR@TREARN>
> From:         Turgut Kalfaoglu <TURGUT@TREARN>
> Subject:      2 file daha trearn-fransa hattini kapattirdi.
> Comments: To: nad-tr@trearn, tekman@trbilun
> Date:         Wed, 24 Jan 1990 15:49:41 TUR
> Comments:     Re-sent from List Processor <LISTSERV@TREARN>
> To:   NAD-TR@TREARN
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        this is wrong.
 
> Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
Hi,
I realized a NEW problem with LISTSERV. This is only for TREARN and TRITU.
The "Re-sent" LISTSERV lists from TREARN-LISTSERV and TRITU-LISTSERV puts
wrong header into "To:" field. I checked and found that although the real
destination user put into the NJE header (you can see this from the headers),
the sender has been put into the "To:" field. I will go on tracing this error.
 
This is not only for TREARN-Lists. This error is happened for other LISTSERV
originated but "re-sent from TREARN" lists, too.
 
This doesn't cause rejection or etc problems, but it is wrong and according
to me it must be put into its old format.
 
Regards,
Ferhat Djavidan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2