Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:37:07 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Organization: |
Michigan State University |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Barak Moshe wrote:
>
> Hi,
> That is an interesting way around the current limitation, but let me suggest
> that if the Lsoft folks are already working on an option to prohibit
> attachments to a list for the next release, probably via a keyword in the
> List header file, may be something like: '* Attachments= No/Yes', then
> if one could use: '* Attachments= No, Log/Nolog' ending up in the attachment
> not sent to the list but being logged or not in the archives, that would do
> the trick, and perhaps this would be both a desired option and one that doesn't
> require a very big effort to implement.
Hi Moshe,
Let me clarify that I think your suggestion is a great idea! I am
sure we have list owners here who would use it. Since others were
trying to suggest various work-arounds using existing features, I
did the same, but I do think that what you suggest would be nicer.
The only problem is, I am not so sure L-Soft will consider it "one
that doesn't require a very big effort".
Margaret
|
|
|