Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:42:50 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
insan.NET |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
is performance an issue if its just a straightforward distribution
list(big)? is there an alternative way to doing it?
thnks,
omr/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LISTSERV give-and-take forum
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ben Parker
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:27 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Setting the To: address
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:01:41 -0500, Dave <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> >Thanks, I didn't see this option. It's exactly what I want, however,
> >I'm scared by the strong warnings in the manual.
>
> They are there for reason.
>
> >Will performance with this option be any worse than using a
> DISTRIBUTE
> >MAIL-MERGE job?
>
> For 10 recipients, no. For 100 or 500, or 1000, the yes.
> Each gets progressively worse. DIST Mail-Merge will be the
> beste method.
>
|
|
|