Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:03:36 -0500
|
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:06:53 -0400, Bruno Robichaud said:
> I see, is there a way to like for example set up listserv so it's send the
> first 500k for example and wait for 10-15 to send the other 500k. And about
Send it in 2 postings, that's easy enough.
> the Big Boy anyone have tips or resource to share with me on best pratice to
> send a lot of email to msn,aol,yahoo and so on without getting in they spam
> filter. Remember that I'm using these numbers for a worst case scenario
> there, I don't think they will send millions of email per day. So if I send
> a millions of email and 500k bounced listserv should not have resource
If you have a million addresses, and half bounce, you *will* get into everybody's
spam filters, because it will look like a "dictionary attack".
Also, if your data is *that* crufty, you almost certainly didn't get a verified
opt-in from the addresses, which will make you very suspect in many people's eyes.
(Listserv's "Subscribe = ,confirm" meets any sane definition of verified opt-in).
If more than 1% is bouncing, you have problems. Big ones. Even 1% is 10K
bounces for a million-address list. And you should only be seeing 1% bounces
on a list that's getting infrequent (monthly or so) postings, simply because 1%
of the people will get new e-mail addresses each month or so. And if you're
posting to the list weekly and washing your list, you should be well under 1K
bounces/posting.
> issues or performance issue? By the way the machine that list is on is a P4
> 3.2 ghz with 1 gigs of ram running on windows server 2003.
Your hardware is almost certainly up to the task. The only way a Windows box
will suffice is if you're running LSMTP.
|
|
|