Liam:


I'am using the CONTENT_FILTER, and it does exactly what I want.


Thanks very much!


------------------
Liam Kelly wrote:

>>Yes, but why not drop it as soon as it's determined to be spam?
>>
>>By sending it on instead of dropping it, all you're doing is wasting bandwidth and cycles.
>>    
>>
>
>Not necessarily.  If you were using the CONTENT_FILTER, you could set the
>action for messages flagged as spam to MODERATE rather than DISCARD.  If
>you didn't trust your AV system enough to let it delete your mail for you
>(and I certainly don't trust mine that much yet), it could make a lot of
>sense to flag the message but send it on to LISTSERV anyway.
>
>Would you let SpamAssassin delete LSTSRV-L mail before you saw it? ;)
>
>  
>