Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:06:38 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:54:15 EST, Jacob Haller said:
>> >I have a few subscribes on some of our lists whose ISPs use
>> >Securence.com. It seems that mail they send is routed through
>> >Securence, given an ID then continued to the destination. The
>> >problem is that Listserv is interpreting the Securence ID embedded
>> >in the header as the originating address and rejects them as not
>> >subscribed.
>> >
>> >[log in to unmask]
>> >
>> >Anyone have experience with this type of problem. I'm sure the
>> >problem lies with Securence, not Listserv.
>>
>> Hmm, this seems strange. Can you share the full headers from a
>> message that has gone through Securence?
>
>It's probably inventing a Sender: field that Listserv doesn't like.
That would certainly be consistent with the symptoms, but it seems
like a kind of an odd thing for an antispam system to do.
--
Jacob Haller, Technical Support, L-Soft international, Inc
LISTSERV (R) is a registered trademark of L-Soft.
Support is available 9:00-18:00 ET, Monday-Friday
except on the following holidays:
<http://www.lsoft.com/resources/holidays.asp>
Knowledge is just a click away: <http://www.lsoft.com/optin.html>
|
|
|