Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LSTSRV-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LSTSRV-L Home LSTSRV-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Funny 'From:' fields
From:
"John F. Chandler" <PEPMNT@CFAAMP>
Reply To:
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011>
Date:
1987 May 15 11:18 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
The old rule, "Be forgiving in what you accept, but rigorous in what you
send out," suggests adoption of the following algorithm (which I use in
my mail processor):
 
1. If filetype is NOTE, then treat as possibly RFC733.
2. If the filetype is NOTE, then discard any continuation lines of the
   field.
3. If the first line of the address field has no '@' anywhere and does
   not end with a comma, then treat as possibly RFC733.
4. If the file is possibly RFC733, and the address field has at least
   3 words, and the next-to-last word is "AT", "At", "aT", or "at",
   then replace the final phrase "word1 at word2" by "<word1@word2>".
5. If, after steps 1-4, the field is invalid, then give up.
 
This algorithm, of course, would present a problem if IBM NOTE changed
by placing quotes around its usual address fields, but I have a feeling
we'll never need to worry about that!
                               John

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV