Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LSTSRV-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LSTSRV-L Home LSTSRV-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@DEARN>
Subject:
Re: A bit of trouble using LISTSERV through ARPA, UUCP...
From:
Eric Thomas <ERIC@FRECP11>
Date:
Sat, 9 Jan 88 16:44:09 SET
In-Reply-To:
Your message of Fri, 8 Jan 88 11:04:50 EST
Reply-To:
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@DEARN>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
1. Your problem is that the gateway sending the mailfile out is not
   officially registered in BITEARN NODES (ie XMAILER NAMES). Thus the
   NJE origin is not a trusted one and does not match the RFC822 origin,
   which is what LISTSERV calls a nasty hacker trying to send a command
   for someone else. A good solution is to modify the gateway code so
   that it sends mail through an official BITNET mailer, using BSMTP.
   This has other advantages, such as allowing the destination site to
   process local aliases (like POSTMASTER) instead of directly dropping
   mail in a (truncated) local mailbox which might or might not exist.
 
3. In UNIX Land, 'Thomas' is not the same userid as 'thomas' or 'THOMAS'.
   Thus,  if you  send mail  to 'THOMAS',  it won't  get to  'thomas' nor
   'Thomas', which are  two different persons. My  personal reaction was,
   how would you like it if the postman decided to put to the trash every
   piece of  snailmail that was  sent to you  with uppercase name?  I got
   flamed so much that I decided to support mixed-case addresses. But you
   have to be consistent with yourself: if 'THOMAS' and 'Thomas' are two
   completely different login names, then removing 'THOMAS' from a list
   should not remove 'Thomas', ok?
 
All  that I  can do  is changed  LSVNADDR to  unconditionally upcase  the
domain-part  of the  address, so  that you  won't have  any problem  with
domain case-matching. This  is perfectly valid, according  to RFC822. But
how  many complaints  from UNIX  bigots will  I get  if I  do that  (like
"'Cambridge' is the way God meant Cambridge to be spelled, and your s***y
mail server addresses me as [log in to unmask] It st*nks of
IBM brain damage!, etc").
 
  Eric

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV