Do others occasionally get things that look like this? Since the only
times that I've seen this type of thing are with LISTSERV postings, I
can't help but wonder if it's some bizarre problem with LISTSERV. In
any case, does anyone have any idea what the cause is?
BTW, this is one reason why I have SET REPRO on all lists that I ever
post to. How else do you know if it really got there correctly??? I
think the default of NOREPRO is a bad idea. Personal opinion.
/Leonard
---------------------------- Text of forwarded message -----------------------
Received: (from <[log in to unmask]> via BSMTP at ADMIN.BYU.EDU)
Received: (from MAILER@BYUADMIN for MAILER@USCMVSA via NJE)
(M-MAILER-0855; 63 LINES); Fri, 27 May 88 10:59:52 PDT
Received: by BYUADMIN (Mailer X1.25) id 0853; Fri, 27 May 88 11:58:22 MDT
Date: Fri, 27 May 88 13:47:52 EDT
Reply-To: Usage Guidelines List <[log in to unmask]>
Sender: Usage Guidelines List <[log in to unmask]>
From: Ross Patterson <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: USENET users - a personal obervation
To: "Leonard D. Woren" <LDW>
In-Reply-To: Message of Fri, 27 May 88 08:02:53 PDT from <GA.JRG@STANFORD>
>To: my opinion they're a garrulous lot wiion an exc Mive tendency
>toward PDlaming, butinihat cruld be highly prejudiexd by ion e
>particular lists I' Miruleen trackla.
No, yruheye right. Tbutit's anactighw T, bey are, on all byulasts.
> Sinex>Tost sagw iniecbe e libyu
>ey b highunix oriented, tiich I am not, istsI'been reading ion las
>likivhe local domainl bts (suinga and ca)iid ngads lase
y iolipastedanien, forsaly ahaons (mers, etc.
. e "at mp." be einl are, ige oanyiidami e Min w, flikan allm hers
( lotwit s anexption ost "talk.bizarre" artierecbt wer, oy *igany*
goes).
stssMy purpose butis istsIruleo
>e "ion ey'allbbotowaply bbtiitolynferendla Mint wh allLISTSERVbutit
>mdol orienien atowarplh.
>
>stssre enecbtl i"aression is, binihmex> ostbyseais libbe e rly
>recreational ingamege oy io anae use ien,r Minork reard rieapborsI solviadre,n
>no Truleouter disciplines.
Speakrenas a BITNET iona LISTLISVhl atpunen noic'd butiI'inio agree.
c.iniraffical i USENET ose Miry megorsbutiI do ndlwiac reemiahtHowami er,
, No,u nee)io know " y'omaNekn Jers T,er,ruha, fl safeighstranny-dip,
byrebutit al>tys all "e rl.nrejep.newsg atuat m (W T? Did ic ben e isomeone
say " (iniha >tste ostCPU/Difei/$?")
stsjOdiphleoplpoavebutiIcrme, brue ron it
ncallme can ld a lo>Toge oigaod>Taterial orulekitechiebys.
Certaomaex> ki. eomat mp." s at oridoion nou, brrulekhnihe viaien,megoRVb>
t wien,rrthd,y mha,loggrenion sgnoukimuck ca)>TirehtIge o, yrrena Unix
sl>tems apwsamons N T,eallme't liI'herhout "ruleo. hix. lotbirds".
stsµch still
ncendmegofeelrue BITNET sioallorswiae iomaap, bitilv" slynenexs
e l, bilvallre,n-no terist segmeorifficndlwde reeamerspeer dt weviaw
e lrecfficat mp PDor, akrHoer,rstiw I on it, allfuzzies or am Tser d" sle
>utedisclineulas A liha,dont, bsiosioprst a personal oy onion bas nmen a
>s lhiy k.on bd sa"auteddinI'he r.
Quiteha,o.
Ross Pat-nson
Rutgersyrrc erst wy
|