This problem is continuing to happen.  Here's the relevant section of
the LISTSERV console.  Is there any further clue here?  The only comment
I've seen came from Ross, suggesting that perhaps (TCSVM? given the console
log for this case) has modified peers file.  I'm baffled.
 
PUN FILE 7268 FROM RSCS     COPY 001   NOHOLD
14 Apr 1988 22:59:14 Processing file (7268) from LISTSERV@TCSVM
14 Apr 1988 22:59:17 From LISTSERV@TCSVM: DIST2 FROM=LISTSERV@TCSVM I=Y FORW(VIA
) HOST(73 73 8 93 79 58 7 12 12 96 78 77 5 (...)
14 Apr 1988 22:59:19 Distributing file "X-LUPD JOB" from LISTSERV@TCSVM...
14 Apr 1988 22:59:21 File forwarded to LISTSERV@OHSTVMA  for 55 recipients.
14 Apr 1988 22:59:22 File forwarded to LISTSERV@TAMVM1   for  2 recipients.
14 Apr 1988 22:59:22 File forwarded to LISTSERV@UMRVMB   for  2 recipients.
14 Apr 1988 22:59:23 File "X-LUPD JOB" distributed to [log in to unmask]
14 Apr 1988 22:59:23 File "X-LUPD JOB" distributed to [log in to unmask]
* File "X-LUPD JOB" from LISTSERV@TCSVM has been sent to you.
14 Apr 1988 22:59:23 End of distribution.
14 Apr 1988 22:59:24 Sent information mail to SCHAFER@RICE
14 Apr 1988 22:59:25 Sent information mail to MARK@RICE
14 Apr 1988 22:59:25 Processing file (7278) from LISTSERV@TCSVM
14 Apr 1988 22:59:27 From LISTSERV@TCSVM: X-LUPD FWD=NO DATE=1988041423:00:10 HD
R=YES
> REP ARPABBS ARPABBS P/Arpanet Bulletin-Boards Redistribution/3090434456
> HDR fields not displayed...
> CKS 2651060900
14 Apr 1988 22:59:34 GLOBLIST FILE has been successfully updated.
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
<Distribute> Server number 111 could not be found in the tables. Its
recipients will be handled directly by [log in to unmask]