|
Sender: |
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@CEARN> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
Zvika Bar-Deroma <AER7101@TECHNION> |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Sep 89 08:57:53 IST |
In-Reply-To: |
Message of Mon, 25 Sep 89 14:04:37 SET from <REICHETZ@AWIIMC11> |
Reply-To: |
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@CEARN> |
On Mon, 25 Sep 89 14:04:37 SET Christian J. Reichetzeder said:
>On Mon, 25 Sep 89 12:19:15 IST Zvika Bar-Deroma said:
>>I got complaints from users subscribed to SAS-L, ....
>>The users get their SAS-L list distributed from [log in to unmask]
>>
>Haven't seen any problems. SAS-L is DIST2 and for almost all recipients the
>job is forwarded to [log in to unmask] Maybe Olivier Martin knows more.
>Christian
Well - reading your answer I REViewed SAS-L (is there no way to
REV the subscribers on one machine only ? It could save network
resources....). There's not even ONE subscriber from TECHNION (checked
all peers). I positively know of two people who were subscribed
and did not UNSUB (am afraid they donno how to "accomplish" this).
About 5 other people were also subscribed, but I don't know them
personally, so I cannot be 100% sure they did nothing...
Any idea what could have gone wrong ??
/Zvika
p.s. - I told the complainers to resubscribe, so that eliminates
their personal problem.
|
|
|