|
Sender: |
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@CEARN> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
"A. Harry Williams" <HARRY@MARIST> |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Oct 89 22:26:08 EDT |
In-Reply-To: |
Message of Mon, 16 Oct 89 09:14:18 EDT from <TS0007@OHSTVMA> |
Reply-To: |
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@CEARN> |
On Mon, 16 Oct 89 09:14:18 EDT Duane D. Weaver said:
>What is the best way to find the best possible peers for a list?
>
>I seem to remember reading something about the LSVBESTP command,
>but I don't remember the syntax. Anyone know the syntax for using
>LSVBESTP or is there a better command to use?
>
>Duane
I wrote a /PEERING local command which is available as a package, or
NADs can execute on my machine. The syntax is
/PEERing list
node1 node2 node3 ...
It uses LSVBITFD. If there is a single word, it uses the Peers= keyword
from the list, otherwise it uses the nodes listed.
It uses a minimal spanning tree of the nodes listed. It also gives the
weight of the given link. (Its output is not pretty, but functional.)
|
|
|