|
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jun 1993 18:32:30 GMT |
Comments: |
|
Organization: |
The American University, Washington DC |
Reply-To: |
|
In <[log in to unmask]> Eric Thomas <[log in to unmask]>
writes:
>Interesting... However, before I make any change to the code I need some
>sort of formal assurance that these tags are indeed present in all
>(conformant) usenet messages, and are not part of any current RFC822
>extension. In fact, I am pretty sure I have seen messages without
>'Supersedes:' or 'Archive-Name:' (I understand you were addressing the
>particular problems of FAQ, but I'd like a solution that works for all
>usenet messages, rather than just FAQ files).
I can only think of one tag which would generally indicate a Usenet
post, and that is "Path:". All the other tags are regularly found in
e-mail, or else they are not required to be in Usenet posts.
Jim McIntosh ([log in to unmask])
The American University
Washington, DC USA 20016-8019
|
|
|