|
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 1 Nov 1994 14:52:41 EST |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
Virginia Polytechnic Institute |
Reply-To: |
|
On Tue, 1 Nov 1994 14:28:28 EST Nick Laflamme said:
>"Respect" says, "If the author generated a 'Reply-To:' line, I trust it."
>"Ignore" says, "I don't trust author-generated 'Reply-To:' lines; insert
>mine!" What I'm asking for is, "Take any Reply-To: fields with a grain of
>salt and add ours for completeness." Note that this is not the same as
>"Both" because one can't assume an author-generated Reply-To: field points
>to the From: address.
Nick:
How is "both" not what you want? I would assume that if a user has gotten
clued in enough to generate a Reply-to: that points elswehere, THAT HE
WANTS HIS REPLY SENT THERE. ;) Therefor, having "both" the list and
any author-generated reply-to: is what you want....
Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Engineer
Virginia Polytechnic Institute
|
|
|