|
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 12 Dec 1994 17:55:09 +0100 |
In-Reply-To: |
Message of Mon, 12 Dec 1994 11:05:30 CET from LISTSERV
give-and-take forum < [log in to unmask]> |
Reply-To: |
|
On Mon, 12 Dec 1994 11:05:30 CET "Janusz S. Bie/n" <[log in to unmask]>
said:
>It seems to me that LISTSERV used to strip MIME headers when placing the
>posting in the list archive - if I am right, then is it stil doing it?
With 1.8b, you can add "Notebook-Headers= FULL". This function is also
available in the VMS/unix/NT versions.
>What is the advantage of using FULLhdr instead of IETFhdr?
There's no advantage or disadvantage, it's just a matter of personal
taste. FULL headers are compatible with the current default headers, they
just have more information. IETF headers are not compatible and likely to
confuse non-technical users.
>BTW, I know IETF stands for Internet Engineering Task Force, but why
>this abreviation was chosen to mean a specific type of header?
A name had to be chosen, and most of the people lobbying for these
headers were also quite vocal on the IETF list.
Eric
|
|
|