Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 8 May 1997 15:52:12 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
America Online, Inc. |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Your message dated: Thu, 08 May 1997 15:26:40 EDT
> If you can find a citation that says that it's legal for an entity to
> refuse payment for a debt merely because the person uses twenty dollar
> bills to do so, and you will only accept one, five, and fifty dollar
> bills (modulo rulings regarding paying in pennies, etc), I'll be more
> willing to listen. Currently, source routes are in the same category
> as $2 US bills - you don't see them often, but they're still legal
> tender.
Describe to me how this relates to "trespass of chattels",
whereby someone is preventing abuse of their property, especially
whereby they are being compelled to pay for the abuse of said
property.
We are not obliged, BY LAW, to accept anything, since the AOL
mail system is private property. Therefore, your entire argument
is null and void.
And that's the last I'll say on this particular issue.
--
Brad Knowles MIME/PGP: [log in to unmask]
Senior Unix Administrator <http://www.his.com/~brad/>
<http://swissnet.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE38CCEF1>
|
|
|