>// JOB
>commands
>// EOJ
>
> type format (the systax is probably entirel incorect, I found
>this a really difficult thing to get right manualy (I just checked an add
>job that I have, that is the format that I have)). Would that not work?
>Would that not allow everything outside of the ``// JOB'' and ``// EOJ''
>markers to be ignored? Just an idea that I haven't seen anyone else
>sugest, maybe because it wouldn't work, but I'd like to know that for
>sure.
That's what I've always used, and it's always worked.
Sherry Beauchamp
Listowner
ADOPTION and XCULTUREADOPT