 
|
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 15 Sep 1997 12:57:51 EDT |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7BIT |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Organization: |
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
On Mon, 15 Sep 1997 08:18:18 -0400 Pete Weiss said:
>|I've yet to understand why LISTSERV requires multi-worded names, it seems
>|to cause more trouble than it's worth.
>
>I've yet to have a problem with LISTSERV requiring multi-worded names, and
>that's w/o trying to bypass.
>
>Of course your mileage may vary.
Yup, YMMV, but for me, the multi-worded names requirement of Listserv has
never been a problem. I have personally been maintaining one list here for
about ten years with an average of 1500 subscribers. As Listserv postmaster
here, I am also indirectly responsible for well over 600 lists and I have
never had a single complaint on this issue.
Stan Horwitz Internet: [log in to unmask] Bitnet: STAN@TEMPLEVM
Temple University -- Senior Consultant (My views are all mine!)
Manager of the Help-Net and Suggest lists and Listserv Postmaster.
|
|
|
