On 17 Mar 97, W Schipper wrote:

> But if it was, then you'd already know, wouldn't you?  It might have
> been equally informative to post only the name of the offending spammer,
> instead of forcing someone to scroll through all 27 pages until the end
> of the message.

The person's name was also at the top.  But I don't think that was the original
spammer, as why would anyone want to get several hundred automated answers?  I
suspect that the recipient probably was either created or innocent.  Perhaps the
spam was directed at an individual (the subscriber) or AOL itself.  I sure get
tired of dealing with the AOL bounces, most of them "mailbox full"

Liz


~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~
          Liz & the Terv Herd
  Somewhere on the beautiful Oregon coast
              Spiritbrook
 Working Labradors, Siberians, Tervuren
            John 4:14
~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~
[log in to unmask]
http://www.harborside.com/home/l/lizm