At 11:22 09/02/2004 Thursday, [log in to unmask] wrote:
 >On 2 Sep 2004 at 11:05, Pete Weiss wrote:
 >
 >> At 10:32 09/02/2004 Thursday, [log in to unmask] wrote:
 >>
 >>  >*
 >>  >*  The Nameless Coffee House Mailing List
 >>  >*
 >>  >*  [log in to unmask] (Maureen Leblanc)
 >>  >*  Owner= Quiet: ,[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask]
 >>  >*  Owner= [log in to unmask] (George LeBlanc)
 >>  >*  Review= Owners
 >>  >*  Subscription= Open
 >>  >*  Send= Owners
 >>  >*  Ack= Yes
 >>  >*  Files= No
 >>  >*  Mail-Via= DIST2
 >>  >*  Notebook= No
 >>  >*  Notify= Yes
 >>  >*  Renewal= Yearly
 >>  >*  Default-Options= Repro, Review
 >>  >*  Editor= Owner
 >>  >*  Stats= Normal, Private
 >>  >*  Topics= STAFF, ANNOUNCE, PERFOFRMERS
 >>  >*  Default-Topics= ANNOUNCE
 >>  >*  X-Tags= Yes
 >>  >*  Auto-Delete= Yes,Full-Auto,Delay(1),Max(25)
 >>  >*  Created 1998/08
 >> End Reply
 >>

 >Actually, I'd also deleted a couple of extraneous header keywords
 >and re-put the header:
 >default-options= review seemed to not be necessary, what with
 >send= owners being defined!  Editor= owner  also seemed
 >unnecessary with send= owner in place.

Depending on your needs, posters'/owners' email addresses can be spoofed
by virii/spammers.  It happens.  Thus if you encounter that problem, you
may re-think the "approval" process.

 >Also updated the spelling of "performers" in the header pete!
 >Thanks!

I had "anxiety" ;-)

 >Will updating and re-putting the header with subscription=
 >Subscription= Open,Confirm do it, do you think? That seems to be
 >fairly protective of everyone.