|
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:27:38 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<Pine.GSO.4.44.0608101339280.18288-100000@infinity> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
We've gone through similar discussions. Individuals didn't want their
mailbox associated with messages to such large groups.
We said "No problem". We'll give you a way to spam your students that
is nice to our mail systems (using Listserv), and we'll give you a
generic mailbox to send messages and receive/handle any replies. Having
seen the results, they (my student spammers) are very happy with the
setup. There sometimes *are* important replies! Sometimes there is a
"kill the messenger" mentality.
cheers, wayne
Winship wrote, in part, on 8/10/2006 2:50 PM:
> Petrus J Martins wrote:
>
>>> The reason I asked is cause we're trying to send out an email to
>>> students giving them information and we don't want our email to get
>>> bulked up with replies, instead we want students to come in or call if
>>> they have any questions. I ended up setting up an account used for
>>> just sending like suggested. Thanks for all other suggestions
>>>
>
> Well, they *are* going to reply, and they *will* be upset that you didn't
> read their replies (you said you don't want to read any replies) and
> respond. Doesn't matter what you say in the "noreply" email, they *will*
> do it and *will* be upset at their replies being ignored. They would much
> prefer sending an email reply over physically going to your office or
> hanging around for lord knows how long trying to wade through your
> automated phone system (if you have one), or being "on hold" for ten or
> fifteen minutes.
>
> I think that you should accept email replies.
>
> Douglas Winship [log in to unmask]
>
|
|
|