The way I read the original e-mail, I do NOT think that
SEND= Editor,Hold,Confirm
will produce the desired result of only certain "problem posters" being
moderated. I predicated that on the requirement of SEND= PRIVATE.
/Pete
At 09:20 04/09/2002 Tuesday, Richard Keller wrote:
>So, from what you're saying, it looks like you want to change Send=Private to
>Send=Editor,Hold,Confirm. If this is the case, in addition to the
>Moderator=All,...,...
>keyword, you will also need to add [log in to unmask] lines as part
>of your
>configuration because it is needed in the configuration to define the
>Moderator(s). This
>would set up confirmation for all subscribers who post to the list. This
>setup would allow
>all Editors to approve messages for the list. LISTSERV will not allow
>duplicate
>messages to be delivered to the list when more than one editor approves a
>message.
>
>You would need to add your name as Editor and Moderator if you wanted to
>be able to
>approve messages.
>
>I hope this helps.
>
>Richard Keller
>
>> The list I manage currently uses Review only for problem posters.
>> This generates a small volume of "approval required" mail and as
>> primary list owner I handle it.
>>
>> However we are considering adding Review to the Default-Options so
>> that new subscribers start out on Review, for a variety of reasons.
>> Currently we have several people listed as list owners, all doing
>> various admin jobs, but no Editors or Moderators -- the header
>> (leaving out notebook settings and owner addresses) is:
>>
>> Subscription= By owner
>> Send= Private
>> Errors-to= Owners
>> Review= Owner
>> Notify= Yes
>> Reply-to= Sender,Ignore
>> Files= No
>> Confidential= No
>> Validate= Yes,Confirm
>> X-Tags= No
>> Ack= No
>> Default-Options= Repro,ShortHDR
>>
>> I have the impression that if I want to change the setup so that all
>> approval requests to go to all list owners and anyone can approve
>> them, I would add this to the header:
>>
>> Moderator= All,[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask], ...
>>
>> where the email addresses listed are those of the various list owners.
>>
>> My questions are:
>>
>> - Is this basically the right approach?
>>
>> - Is there any reason I also need to define Editor= ?
>>
>> - Do I need to put my own address in the Moderator= list, or will I
>> continue to receive the approval requests as primary list owner?
>>
>> Thanks ...
>>
>> -----
>> Tom Rawson [log in to unmask]
End Reply
|