>         I think Pete has reversed "latter" and "former," but my real
> problem with his solution is that my list has more than 3500 subscribers,
> and his solution isn't really practical for so large a list.  I wish there
> were a command I could send to LISTSERV that would send me back a list of
> just those subscribers with certain options--for example, just those who
> are concealed, or just those set to NOMAIL.  I don't know how difficult
> that would be to implement, Eric, but I for one would welcome such a
> feature.
 
Joan, me too...I'm just curious about one thing; if you were to send to
listserv the command
 
        quiet set wmst-l noconceal for *@*
 
would that return you a list of the people affected (ie those set to
conceal), or would it not do anything?
 
Jeff