Tue, 9 Jan 2001 12:22:44 -0500
|
On: Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:51:57AM -0500,Karen Reznek Wrote:
} We recently set our list to default to reply to list rather than reply to
} sender. However, reply to all does not give the option of replying to to
} both when the list address is the default. The person replying no longer
} has the option of removing the list address for a private reply. Is there
} any way to set that up? The only workaround I've found is to right click
} on the address and select "add sender to address book", but many of our
} users aren't comfortable enough with their mail programs to take that
} many steps.
Thats a function of the mailer you use. Some will, some won't.
For example, mine (mush on a unix shell) if there is a reply-to asks if
thats where I want the reply to go, and if I say no, then sends it to
the from address.
--
Rich Greenberg Work: Rich.Greenberg atsign worldspan.com +1 770-563-6656
N6LRT Marietta, GA, USA Play: richgr atsign panix.com +1 770-321-6507
Eastern time zone. I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67
Canines:Val(Chinook,CGC,TT), Red & Shasta(Husky,(RIP)) Owner:Chinook-L
Atlanta Siberian Husky Rescue. Adopt a homeless Husky. Asst Owner:Sibernet-L
|
|
|